Spring Conference

In MN, you would hardly know it is spring.  There is at least a foot of snow out there and more to come.  Nevertheless, the St. Mary's Spring Conference is upon us and I get to pick 5 sessions that interest me.  These sessions are lead by 2nd year Masters Program students and highlight their work over the last two years.  I would actually be excited about attending the sessions except that I have a prior commitment for that day.  So instead, I am sad to say that I will miss several great sessions about topics that I think would truely be useful to me in my practice.

The sessions I picked center around technology, literacy, and engagement.  The first session I picked is about integrating technology (specifically iPads) into a health education class.  While my discipline is high school math, I think it would have been great to see how someone was able to use iPads in their class.  I also picked another session about using iPads in the classroom.  This particular session will be lead by an elementary teacher, so again, it is not my discipline, but it still would be great to see how someone integrated iPads and other technology into the classroom.

The other sessions I picked focus on student engagement, literacy, and staff morale.  An elementary teacher chose to use movement in her class to see the impact on student engagement.  She suggests that her students did show improvement and were more likely to be engaged during learning times.  I have used games and other activities in class and seen the positive effects of movement for high schoolers.

The fourth session I would have liked to attend regards staff morale and the impact on student achievement.  I think it is very true that staff morale has an affect on students.  I would be curious to hear the results of his research and to know how he improved the morale at his school.

The final session I picked is about incorporating literacy strategies into the math classroom.  I was excited to finally have a math-specific session!  Then I saw that it was an elementary classroom!  Foiled again!  In any case, I am sure there would be something useful there for me.  Afterall, if literacy is about understanding context and knowing how to answer a question, any strategy used in elementary school should be able to be used at the secondary level to some degree.

I truely wish I could attend these sessions.  It would have been wonderful to see the final results of someone's research - especially considering I will be doing this in about a year!

21st Century Learning

We, as teachers, definitely live in a technological world.  Most of us have students who know more about using technology than we do!  Using technology is a way to speak the language of our students.  It engages them and offers another way to learn and be a part of the classroom.

In my classroom, we are starting to offer podcast videos for students to watch when they are absent or need a little extra help.  Our special education department has used these videos when working with students who have learning disabilities as a way to provide another means for learning.  We also use websites, texting programs, and response clickers to communicate with our students.  

Education is a dynamic field, or at least it should be.  I feel as though our M.Ed. program at St. Mary's is all about finding a strategy that works for us and our students.  It might also be that multiple strategies work for us.  If 21st Century Learning is a way to help our students and we, as teachers, feel comfortable incorporating it into our classrooms, then we should try to do so.  This might mean learning about what resources are out there or learning how to use a new piece of technology.  It might also mean messing up a few times and learning from mistakes.  No changes happen overnight.  Perhaps little by little, I can begin to speak the language of my students if I am willing to learn and try new things.

Tech to Check?

Anyone who teaches at a public school understands the problem with grading 140+ students homework on a daily basis.  If you are like me, you probably collect it, maybe look it over, and give them credit for attempting their homework.  Personally, I feel like my homework scores are a bit inflated.  I justify this by only making homework 10% of their overall grade and constantly reminding them that their test grades will reflect their efforts.

But what if I could actually gauge their understanding on their homework?  What if I had an easy way to check for completion and understanding?  Hmmm...wouldn't that be something?

We have at our disposal a number of technological gadgets and gizmos that, to be honest, the students know more about than we do.  We have text messaging, google forms and docs, and student "clickers" that sit around collecting dust.  Why not take some time to enter the homework answers into a file where students can check their own homework?  Why, we could even just pick 2 or 3 problems to check.  What a concept!

In response to this epiphany, I would really like to try using technology in some way to force students to check their homework so that we can both see what they get and don't get in a very immediate way.  I don't know yet how it will be graded, but that's a detail that can easily be worked out.